The top micro frontend frameworks can bring together multiple microservices to serve a broader range of users.
A micro frontend framework introduces microservices to the user interface design. Micro-Frontend.org visualizes this approach as an evolution of earlier web design techniques.
The Monolith paradigm requires a team of experts independently experienced in frontends, backends, and databases. On the other hand, the Front & Back paradigm has frontend designers working independently while backend and database team members collaborate.
Micro frontends allow End-to-End Teams of frontend, backend, and database professionals working toward a common goal, breaking down the backend and frontend monolith paradigm.
For example, an e-commerce website might have three teams:
Instead of having one group work on the backend and one on the frontend of a website, companies create different teams that use their unique skills to accomplish a common goal.
Some of the benefits of using the top micro frontend frameworks include:
Building micro frontends also has potential downsides that different teams should consider when planning their designs. Some of the most common challenges include:
Now that we’ve covered the basics, pros, and cons, let’s review the top micro frontend frameworks so you can decide which one best fits your existing teams and ecosystem.
One of the most popular frameworks when it comes to micro frontends is Bit. It is a product-ready solution for building micro frontends.
Besides the ability to create, Bit offers the possibility to manage frontends through independent component.
When it comes to ensuring that each frontend gets its own neutral and fast build process, Bit provides a special CI/CD process that is fully component driven.
This means that different teams can freely incorporate changes without any delay to create a unified project.
The overall workflow process is enhanced by simple decoupled codebases, small defined APIs, independent pipelines for release and, independent teams.
Luigi is a modular top micro frontend framework that helps you decompose your monolithic web apps and prepare for leaner rebuilding. It enables a web app to communicate directly with the Micro frontends that is composed with.
In order to make this communication run painlessly and avoid any breakdown or flaws, settings configurations can be done in routing, navigation, user experience elements and authorization.
The enterprise-level framework gets used by small businesses and multinational corporations. Its agnostic technology means that you will never get locked into a specific server, provider, or coding language.
Piral is a great tool for those who look forward to use micro frontends to build portal applications. Decoupled modules are known as Pilets, which allow you to create a modular frontend app.
We should know that a Pilet is developed separately and is shipped with the required property for Micro frontend development.
By breaking the development lifecycle into two halves, Piral is capable of tackling the entire process.
You typically start with the application shell, beginning with the template and progressing through debugging, building, and publishing. Then, before debugging, creating, and publishing, work on the individual modules (Pilets), taking care of infrastructure.
Like many top micro frontend frameworks, Piral is open-source and community-driven. Unlike with a lot of open-source tools, though, you can pay for Piral support that will improve your web development workflow.
You get a robust framework, but you also get professional help when you need it.
This tool is what you need to apply in every application lifecycle when you developed using Micro frontand.
Every application must be able to respond to URL routing events and must be able to bootstrap, mount, and unmount from the DOM.
Single SPA differs from typical SPA in that applications must be able to coexist with one another. They don't each get their own HTML page. The Single SPA framework is used by a number of major services, including Google Maps, Gmail, and Grammarly, to mention a few.
Single-spa has always been a leader in the push for choosing micro frontends over monoliths, so you will find plenty of tutorials, videos, and support.
If you’re willing to spend a little money ($109 to $149, depending on the course), you can even take official workshops covering micro frontend fundamentals and micro frontend architecture.
Choosing this option makes sense when you have a development team with diverse skills and want to keep projects simple.
Then, when you update your product, you know that the features will work as intended.
Module Federation focuses on micro frontends but doesn’t limit itself to those frameworks, thereby giving developers a lot of flexibility.
This is one of the most effective tools for dealing with the code dependency issue, and it allows for bundle size expansion through dependency sharing.
For example, you can use Module Federation to load remote modules through a chunk loading operation. This process lets everything load in parallel from a single round-trip to the server.
Other critical concepts that make Module Federation useful include:
Contributors can vote to influence the features the Module Federation team prioritizes, making it a community-oriented project that moves in the direction most experts find beneficial.
SystemJS can transpile production workflow code to operate at near-native speeds. Runtime tests show that uncached native modules loaded in 1668ms compared to SystemJS’s 2334ms.
Cached native modules loaded in 49ms while SystemJS loaded in 81ms. At these speeds, human users will not recognize the difference.
Despite the speed, SystemJS gives you plenty of features for performing tasks such as reloading workflows, loading global scripts, and importing maps.
SystemJS lets us use different JS module-related features such as import maps and dynamic imports without the need for native browser support.
Few of SystemJS prominent capabilities include the ability to facilitate module imports by mapping names to paths, the ability to Polyfill for older browsers, and the ability to set up multiple modules in a single file format utilizing its API to execute single network queries for multiple JS modules.
You can also use it for HTML and CSS. However, its option to contain logic as a server-side Node.js application sets the framework apart.
When necessary, you can use it to inject highly interactive HTML into a page.
Our team of professionals have the right experience with the top micro frontend frameworks, hence, feel free to reach out and let us help you choose an option that matches your needs.
Our software engineers can also provide software applications and sub-applications that fuel your product’s success.
Contact us and let's start discussing about finding solutions to any of your web app issues.